The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) recently imposed a £15 million fine on PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) for failing to alert the regulator to suspected fraudulent activities at London Capital & Finance plc (LCF). This unprecedented decision marks the first time that the FCA has fined an audit firm and underscores the critical role auditors play in safeguarding financial markets.
The case has significant implications for the financial services sector, particularly in terms of audit responsibility, fraud detection, and the importance of regulatory compliance. Charlotte Gregory, Paul Chadwick and Fern Dempsey report below.
The Case Against PwC
PwC was engaged as LCF’s statutory auditor from September 2016 to October 2017, during which it encountered substantial challenges. LCF later entered administration on 13 January 2019 after the FCA ordered the firm to withdraw misleading promotional material for the sale of mini bonds that did not explain all the associated risks. This collapse left thousands of investors facing severe financial losses and revealed the extent of LCF’s misconduct.
Throughout the audit, LCF was highly uncooperative, displaying aggressive behaviour towards PwC and providing misleading and inaccurate information. These actions raised multiple red flags, leading PwC to reasonably suspect that LCF might be involved in fraudulent activities. The FCA’s Final Notice reports that, at one stage, PwC sought advice on the content of a draft email to LCF from its internal legal team, fearing it might inadvertently tip off the client about their suspicions.
Despite these suspicions, PwC ultimately failed to report its concerns to the FCA. Under Regulation 2 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Communications by Auditors) Regulations 2001 and section 342(6) of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA), PwC was legally obligated to promptly report any suspicions of fraud. However, PwC’s hesitation deprived the FCA of crucial information that could have enabled earlier intervention, potentially mitigating the impact on investors.
Uncovering Fraud: Red Flags and Fraudster Behaviour
The behaviour exhibited by LCF’s management during the audit process was indicative of fraudulent activity and resonates with patterns observed in many other cases of financial misconduct. Managers engaging in fraud often display obstructive or evasive behaviour, manipulate or withhold financial information, and attempt to mislead auditors. These actions serve as critical red flags that auditors and financial professionals must recognise and act upon.
The FCA found that, whilst PwC’s breach was not deliberate or reckless, it was serious. Whilst PwC determined that LCF’s 2016 accounts were accurate, the various red flags that emerged during the audit should have led to prompt reporting of its suspicions to the FCA. This oversight highlights the importance of auditors maintaining a vigilant and proactive approach when faced with suspicious behaviour, as early detection of fraud can prevent significant financial losses and protect consumers.
The Role of Regulation and Enforcement
The FCA’s enforcement action against PwC underscores the importance of regulatory oversight in the financial services sector, particularly in cases involving potentially fraudulent practices. The case also draws attention to the challenges posed by unregulated financial products, such as mini bonds. LCF primarily sold mini bonds which were not regulated by the FCA. As a result, many of LCF’s customers were not eligible for protection from the Financial Services Compensation Scheme, leaving them particularly vulnerable when the company failed. Although a government compensation scheme was later introduced, the absence of initial regulatory protection for these products exacerbated the impact on investors.
The overlap between regulatory enforcement and criminal investigation is also evident in this case. The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has been involved in investigating LCF and the individuals responsible for its misconduct. The scope of its original investigation was expanded in 2020 to include investments offered by LCF and its predecessor Sales Aid Finance (England) Ltd [SAFE] between 2013 and 2018. Several individuals have since been arrested and interviewed in relation to fraud and money laundering offences and thousands of victims have come forward to both the SFO and the FCA.
This collaboration between the FCA and the SFO highlights the need for close coordination between regulatory and law enforcement agencies to effectively combat financial crime as their resources are increasingly stretched. The SFO and the FCA updated their Memorandum of Understanding in 2023 setting out principles of co-operation, and their joint intention to better deliver in areas of common interest in sharing information, developing intelligence, new investigations and investigations and prosecutions.
Moving Forward
The £15 million fine levied against PwC serves as a powerful reminder of the responsibilities that auditors and financial firms have in protecting consumers and maintaining the integrity of financial markets. The LCF case illustrates the catastrophic consequences that can arise when these responsibilities are not fully met.
For professionals involved in auditing, compliance, and financial oversight, the lessons from this case are clear: vigilance, rigorous adherence to reporting obligations, and a deep understanding of the behaviours associated with fraud are essential in safeguarding the financial system. The industry must continue to evolve its practices to better detect and respond to the warning signs of fraud, ensuring that such failures do not occur in the future. By doing so, financial firms can help maintain trust in the markets and protect consumers from the devastating effects of financial misconduct.
How can we help?
If your business requires assistance or further information on FCA or SFO matters, please contact our Financial Services or Business Crime & Investigations teams.
